Land owners and activists yesterday staged a protest at the legislature in Taipei, accusing the government of reneging on its promise and abruptly passing proposed revisions to the Land Expropriation Act (土地徵收條例) to second reading without prior discussion.
They also expressed their concern that the Cabinet-proposed revisions might eventually be adopted, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enjoys an absolute majority in the legislature.
Following a slew of protests over government seizure of private land for development projects around the country, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) made several promises to amend the Land Expropriation Act, including requiring land developers to clearly state that they are necessary and how the project would uphold public interests.
Photo: CNA
However, the amendments proposed by the Cabinet did not include such clauses and only aim to change the basis for calculation of compensation for landowners from published prices to market prices.
Landowners and other advocacy groups said the proposed revisions should also include the participation of a third-party expert when estimating the land value.
In a bid to ensure that the amendments are passed before the legislative election in January, the Legislative Yuan — under the KMT’s lead — decided to skip initial discussions in the first reading and pushed the proposal straight into second reading.
“The KMT put the amendments directly into second reading to avoid discussions in the Internal Administration Committee,” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) told a news conference at the Legislative Yuan. “With its absolute majority, the KMT could pass the amendments despite opposition, and the expectations of landowners, farming activists and other rights advocacy groups would be sacrificed.”
“While Ma is having his ‘homestay’ tour around the country for his re-election campaign, I invite the president to stay at my house and the homes of all land expropriation victims,” Metro A7 Station Development Project Self-Help Group chairwoman Hsu Yu-hung (徐玉紅) said. “He should stay with us, eat with us, work with us, be treated by us and hear what we have to say.”
The expropriation project is part of the “A7 station of the Taoyuan International Airport MRT development project,” which aims to build affordable housing units and an industrial zone near the temporarily named “A7 station” on the planned Taoyuan International Airport MRT line connecting central Taipei and Taoyuan County.
A tearful Peng Hsiu-chun (彭秀春), a resident of Dapu Borough (大埔), Jhunan Township (竹南), said she was saddened when she received an official notice from the Miaoli County Government informing her that her home was to be taken over for a science park project.
“The house that I live in is the product of a lifetime of hard work by me and my family,” she said. “The legislature should revise the Land Expropriation Act according to the people’s voices, so that no one in this country would live in constant fear of having their property taken away by the government.”
Wang Wan-ying (王婉盈), a resident of Houli District (后里) in Greater Taichung, whose house was torn down to make way for Phase 3 of the Central Taiwan Science Park, said that if the government was sincere about increasing the nation’s self-sufficiency in food, “it should stop taking over farmlands for development projects.”
A Hualien pomelo farmer refused to sell to China after the country announced it would permit more Taiwanese pomelo imports, prompting widespread support from Taiwanese consumers, who rallied to buy his fruit. China’s Taiwan Affairs Office last month said that China’s General Administration of Customs registered an additional 79 Taiwanese pomelo orchards and packing facilities in Hualien County, allowing more Taiwanese producers to export pomelos to China. “I am a Hualien fruit farmer and I refuse to sell to China,” Liu Tzu-hao (劉子豪) from Ruisui Township (瑞穗) said in an online post. Liu is a well-known farmer in the community and has served
Ocean Affairs Council (OAC) Minister Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) on Wednesday said decommissioned coast guard vessels were given to the Philippines to enhance regional rescue capacity and would not affect Taiwanese fishers’ rights and benefits. Kuan made the remarks after confirmation on Tuesday that a 500-tonne Coast Guard Administration (CGA) patrol and rescue vessel would be given to the Philippine Coast Guard. The donation ceremony was reportedly done in Manila, but whether the vessel — previously numbered “CG123” and named Kinmen (金門) — has been handed over has yet to be confirmed. China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) on Wednesday criticized the donation for “taking
UPDATE: The submarine would need to undergo combined systems testing and crew training for navy personnel before it is ready for mission, an expert said Taiwan’s first domestically built submarine, the Hai Kun (Narwhal, 海鯤), could be delivered to the navy as early as next month, military expert and Taiwan Association for Security and Development chairman Chi Tung-yun (紀東昀) said yesterday. The submarine was yesterday morning observed departing for its 21st sea trial and its 15th submerged test. The vessel missed the initial delivery deadline of November last year due to “testing delays,” its primary contractor, shipbuilder CSBC Corp, Taiwan, said in June. The contractor also cited “political pressure from China” in procuring critical equipment. All testing operations are in the final stages, with the
Six NT$10 million (US$315,527) special prizes and seven NT$2 million grand prizes in Taiwan's May-June uniform invoice lottery remained unclaimed as of today, including one NT$10 million winner who spent only NT$10 on an Uber Eats delivery order, the Ministry of Finance said. The ministry said the 13 winners need to claim their prizes by Nov. 5. The eight-digit serial number that won the NT$10 million special prize for May-June was 38548029, with 18 winning receipts in total. The NT$2 million grand prize number was 10138845, of which there were 22 winning receipts, the ministry said. In addition to the receipt issued for an